Northern Virginians Call for Eliminating Discrimination in the Adoption Process
Del. Adam Ebbin, adoptive parents, adoption agencies and others call on Gov. McDonnell to recommend changes to current regulations
A group of Northern Virginians on Wednesday called for Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell and the state Board of Social Services to make it easier for gay, lesbian and unmarried couples to adopt children.
Representatives from the Human Rights Campaign, a lesbian, gay, transgender, and bisexual civil rights organization, along with Virginia Del. Adam Ebbin, Equality Virginia, Adoptions Together and parents spoke at a Thursday morning event urging changes to current state law.
Greg Greeley of Alexandria said he was rejected by dozens of adoption agencies in his quest to adopt a child as a single, gay man. When he finally found an agency, they said he had to go to Russia to adopt and couldn’t adopt in Virginia.
“I now have a son who is 10 years old but he’d love to have a brother, maybe two. Our hope is that when it’s time to get a brother for Kolya, we’d like to get one from Virginia,” said Greeley at the event held in a conference room at the City of Alexandria’s Office of Human Rights.
The State Board of Social Services is considering proposed regulations that would ban discrimination based on sexual orientation but not marital status. Gov. McDonnell has said he opposes the proposal.
Current Virginia law allows for sexual orientation discrimination in private adoption agencies licensed by the state. Additionally, unmarried couples can be denied the ability to adopt a child and the state cannot provide any relationship recognition for same-sex couples as a result of the 2006 Marshall-Newman amendment defining marriage as solely between one man and one woman.
The speakers called for the governor to recommend and the state board to enact the regulations, but also to go further by proposing a law making the best interest of the child the sole basis for adoption, not whether someone is gay or whether two adults are married.
John Solomonese, HRC President for the Alexandria and Richmond areas, said, “Today we’re asking McDonnell to put Virginia’s children first,” adding that there are 1,000 children in Virginia waiting to be matched with a parent.
“By ending discrimination against gays and lesbians…We can open hundreds if not thousands of homes,” he said. “Sexual orientation plays no role in an ability to raise children.”
He added that the American Academy of Pediatrics supports legislation allowing same-sex couples to adopt.
Del. Adam Ebbin (D-Alexandria) said, “It would be a tragedy to deny these children a home.”
Ebbin said he plans to “explore” crafting legislation that would allow adoption to proceed if it’s in the best interest of a child, but said he was waiting to see what action the state board will take.
“Adoption is a personal act of love, that’s what needs to be focused on, not the politics, that’s what will guide my decisions legislatively," he said.
Equaility Virginia Board Member Lawrence Webb, who also sits on the Falls Church City Council, said he and his partner have been having conversations about adoption, “but we know that will be a difficult task in Virginia.”
Janice Goldwater, the founder and executive director of Adoptions Together, which is licensed in Virginia, Maryland and D.C., recounted the story of one family of Virginians who rented out their house and moved to Maryland to adopt. They plan to return to Virginia when their family further expands through additional adoptions.
“When a family from Virginia calls we say please move to Maryland or D.C.,” said Goldwater. “Who are we turning away? We’re turning away parents of all races, parents who are police officers, teachers, medical professionals, mature loving stable adults in Virginia.”
The governor has until Saturday to make his recommendations on the matter.
Neighbor
7:15 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011
This article does not cite a single source opposed to gay adoption. It mentions Gov. McDonnell but only as a whipping boy for the numerous gay activists quoted here. Story does not quote the governor or explain why he is opposed to the idea. Please, when you set out to write about an issue as controversial as this, try to represent both sides fairly. And yes, there is another side to this story. It is not hidden from view -- you're just not looking for it.
Rachael Dickson
11:16 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011
Since the article was written about a specific event and not the issue as a whole, I understand why it's written the way it was. Here's a bit more info about the topic:
If the proposal passes, state-licensed private and church-run agencies would be required by law to allow unmarried couples - both heterosexual and homosexual - to adopt. Some religious agencies say that if this passed, they would be forced to get out of the adoption business all together rather than take actions which they believe are in violation of their faith's tenets. The president of the Family Foundation recently told the Washington Post that she opposes the proposal on the basis of religious freedom.
Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli has also said that the State Board of Social Services lacks the authority to approve an anti-discrimination policy for adoptive and foster parents. This is opposition to a December 2009 ruling by the attorney general's office under Bill Mims that the state board did have the authority to appeal the existing regulation and put into place a new one.
McDonnell has said that he opposes the proposal because he doesn't think the government should force faith-based adoption agencies to take on certain policies beyond current regulations - which say you can't discriminate on the basis of race, color or national origin.
The Board will ultimately make their own decision and can choose to pay attention to or ignore the AG and governor's thoughts on the proposal.