patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Your Turn: You Come Up with Transportation Funding

Fairfax County is asking residents to weigh in with a survey.

 

Fairfax County faces an estimated $3 billion gap in transportation funding over the next decade, and officials are now seeking ways to raise funds.

From now until fiscal year 2021, the county has $8.1 billion in needs but anticipates only $5.1 billion in revenues, Fairfax County Department of Transportation Director Tom Biesiadny said. Funding from the state or federal governments is unlikely to come through.

Fairfax County is asking residents to complete a survey so officials can learn how to fund these transportation improvements.

There are 20 options to fund transportation improvements, including the following:

  • Income Tax
  • Sales Tax
  • Meals Tax
  • Gas Tax (cents per gallon or a percentage of sales price)
  • Real Estate Tax
  • Hotel Tax
  • Regional Vehicle Registration Fee
  • Initial Registration Fee on New and Newly Located Vehicles
  • Real Estate Transfer Tax
  • Vehicle Repair Sales Tax on Labor
  • Safety Inspection Fee
  • Personal Property Tax
  • Vehicle Miles Traveled Fee
  • Commercial Parking Fee
  • Developer Contributions
  • Tolls
  • Sales Tax on Services
  • Increased Commercial and Industrial Tax Rate
  • Make fewer transportation improvements rather than adding new sources of revenue

Residents have until 4:30 p.m. Oct. 12 to complete the survey. To take the survey, click here.

Patch wants to know: How would you fund transportation improvements in the county? Tell us in the comments section below.

Related Topics: Fairfax County, Your Turn, and transportation funding

Ed Hart

6:51 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Done. That was easy. Allen really messed up the whole state transportation budget. He should simply have adjusted the car property tax rates downward across the board. Instead he chose to make it a partisan campaign issue and convinced his voters that it wasn't needed. Transportation funding should be a statewide balancing act, not local. The car tax was the fairest way to maintain revenues for everyone.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kathy Keith

7:56 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Ed, I'm confused. Wasn't the "car tax" Gilmore's issue. I don't remember Allen running on it--I do remember Gilmore making it a campagin issue.

Comment_arrow

Ed Hart

9:38 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

Yes, thank you. Silly me. but they do seem interchangeable in retrospect..

Glenn Baker

9:28 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I am curious about the changes to the car tax relief this year, as I somehow have a car that is one year older with sign more miles on it and I paid $1065 in car tax this year versus $1045 last year. How can it have gone UP $20 when the car is a year older?!?!? And looking at the possible funding fees and taxes what the heck is a "Vehicle Traveled Miles fee" Now I am going to be taxed if I actually drive my car?

My suggestion would be for developers to be required to make improvements to the local roads and infrastructure in areas they build in as new communities or office/retail sites, and also contribute additional funds (A small percentage say 1%) toward overall road and traffic and infrastructure projects around the county. The reason I say keep the fee small is that they will undoubtably pass that cost on to their clients who buy the new houses/buildings as most taxes levied on businesses end up.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elizabeth Conway

2:48 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Our car taxes were more this year also. I think some of the information with the bill said the amount of relief was reduced this year.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Beth Lawton

2:51 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Patch has an article coming out this weekend about the car tax: Essentially, with the economy being down, more people are looking at used cars instead of new cars. Because the demand is high for used cars and supply is dropping, some used cars are actually becoming MORE valuable instead of depreciating.

Comment_arrow

cmvoorhees

9:33 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Since 1988, the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors have had the authority from the Virginia Assembly to levy a Transportation Impact Fee that would require developers to make improvements to local roads as stated above. The Transportation Impact Fee would be levied even in so-called "by-right" scenerios so transportation infrastructure is built before the opening of a new store (e.g., the Wal-mart at Kings Crossing or the several new stores that are being built now without any transportation infrastructure improvements).

Comment_arrow

Sally Spangler

9:43 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

That's an easy answer. The same one my house belongs to - the County decided it needed more money so instead of deletion because of age and use - your car is worth more simply because the County wants to gouge more money out of all of us.
My 43 year old home is worth more money than it ever has!!!!! Maybe we should be happy that we can all afford(?) to pay the County for their "forward thinking" hahaha! grimace.

John Boling

10:02 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Interesting in that the only options available raise money from new taxes or fees. We pay a hefty amount in taxes to the county. Maybe the county should align their responsibilities with the taxes available instead of using this gimmik to then suggest that the people support raising taxes on themselves. I can't wait for the moment they propose doing what was suggested in the survey and then say that this is what the citizens wanted.

Reply

Sally Spangler

12:56 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Yes Mr. Bolling - instead of figuring out how to get more money for dreams wanted by the population - tell it like it is!!!! There is no money with which to make the dreams come true. If you want it badly enough to put in a $1,000 or so of your income or maybe even better, donate some of your invested dollars to pay for your dreams! And Fairfax County - We don't need to compete with Arlington County to become the most congested part of Northern Virginia. You also can take a pay cut and that money put into the dreams of the population. If I can live on less than $30K a year, so can you.

Reply

Keary Kincannon

9:09 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

No to toll roads please. This especially hurts low-income families more who must travel to get to work. A hotel tax to get the many millions of visitors to our area to pay their share of road improvements is an idea I favor.

Reply

Sally Spangler

9:46 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

Keary - use side streets to get where you are going. I've been doing it for years. May take a bit longer, but I'm not paying luxury tax to use the multi-lane highways that are crowded most of the time these days.

Reply

Sally Spangler

3:20 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Funding new roads? How about all the out of state cars that belong, obviously to people/families living in Fairfax County, but pay NO COUNTY TAXES! It used to be that every fall the police were parked in front of Gunston Elementary School and checked tags, driver's licenses, and driver IDs. NO Virginia information proving the car and driver were actually living in Fairfax County meant a fine and the driver needed to IMMEDIATELY to get his car registered in Virginia along with tags reflecting the car as domiciled in Fairfax County. The only way you got out of it was to be a short term visitor or a military person of short term residence. Maybe we should go back to that? Wonder how much more money would be raised with just that increase of cars properly tagged and licensed. The Driver would also be a registered home owner/renter in Virginia and Fairfax County - also a registered tax payer for County and State residence!

Reply

Leave a comment